The
Brechner Report
Volume 22, Number 10
October 1998
A monthly report:
- Michele D. Bush, Editor
- Jackie Thomas, Production Coordinator
- Allyson Beutke, Production Assistant
- Jennifer Page, Production Assistant
- Bill F. Chamberlin, Ph.D., Director
- Sandra F. Chance, J.D., Asst. Director
Brechner Center for Freedom of Information
3208 Weimer Hall
College of Journalism and Communications
University of Florida, Gainesville, 32611
ACCESS
MEETINGS
Official arrested
for secretly recording colleagues
City
commission plans to vote again to avoid violation
Judge closes hospital lease
meeting
Councils on Aging open to public
LIBEL
Former mayor wins
multi-million dollar verdict
Actress sues Home Shopping
Network
Student, Florida Blue Key settle
COURTS
Judge lifts ban on
broadcasting jurors face
Judge denies
request for gag order in murder trial
ACCESS
RECORDS
Appeals
court: draft not public
No violations by Escambia
school district
NEWS
& NOTES
Foundation holds Sunshine
seminars
TRADEMARK
Retail chain says
site using their name
BACKPAGE
Computerized
records may be hard to access
Official
arrested for secretly recording colleagues
VENICE A Venice City Council member was arrested and charged with
one count of interception by oral communication for making a secret tape-recording of a
private meeting attended by fellow council members.
The Florida Department of Law Enforcement arrested Earl Midlam after a
six-week investigation. According to FDLE records, Midlam said during an interview that he
accidentally taped the conversation of three council members who shared council office
space. In another interview, according to FDLE records, Midlam admitted that he
deliberately left his voice-activated tape recorder on in the office in an attempt to
catch his colleagues violating Floridas Open Meetings Law. According to the open
meetings law, the public must be notified of meetings between two or more members of a
public board or committee who discuss some matter upon which action could be taken by the
board or committee.
Midlam was charged with the third-degree felony for recording a
conversation without consent from all parties. The day he was arrested, he resigned from
the city council. (8/20/98)
City
commission plans to vote again to avoid violation
DUNEDINThe Dunedin City Commission will vote for a second time on
a road project because the first vote may have been tainted with an Open Meetings Law
violation.
Two members of the commission, who are also members of the Metropolitan
Planning Organization, met in private with city, county and state officials regarding a
road project that was to come before the city commission for vote. According to
Floridas Open Meetings Law, a meeting between two or more members of a board or
commission during which a matter is to be discussed upon which the board or commission may
take action must be open to the public.
A third member of the commission, who did not attend the meeting in
question, brought the issue to the attention of the full commission. The city will have
another hearing and another vote on the project. (8/26/98)
Judge closes
hospital lease meeting
KEY WEST A circuit judge used a new exemption to Florida Open
Meetings Law to allow a hospital to have a closed meeting to discuss a proposal to lease
it.
Chief Circuit Judge Sandra Taylor, 16th Judicial Circuit, allowed the
Lower Florida Keys Health System to block public access to a board meeting during which
members discussed the possibility of a $20 million, 30-year lease.
A lawsuit has been filed to determine whether the hospital system is
publicly or privately owned.
Judge Taylor made no determination about the ownership of the hospital
system. She based her decision on a law enacted during the 1998 legislative session that
allows a private corporation that leases a public hospital to be exempt from
Floridas Open Records and Open Meetings laws. Taylor said there was no evidence
showing that the exemption could not apply to the hospital. (8/1/98)
Councils on Aging
open to public
TALLAHASSEE The Florida Attorney General has determined that
meetings of the Councils on Aging are subject to the provisions of Floridas Open
Meetings Law.
The council fits the definition of a public agency according to the law
because it is a nonprofit organization created by the Florida Legislature whose activities
are on behalf of the Department of Elderly Affairs, Bob Butterworth said in Attorney
General Opinion 98-55.
Floridas Open Meetings Law requires that all meetings of any board
or commission of a state agency during which official acts are to be taken must be open to
the public. (9/14/98)
Former
mayor wins multi-million dollar verdict
VERO BEACH A community activist has been ordered to pay a former
Vero Beach mayor $4.7 million in a libel suit. Former mayor Bill Jordan sued community
activist Frank Zorc after Zorc distributed fliers that suggested Jordan was guilty of
perjury, bribery, witness tampering and violating the states open records and open
meetings laws. Zorc distributed the fliers after a disagreement with Jordan about a
property sale.
The jury ordered Zorc to pay $2.9 million for libeling Jordan, $1.25
million for damages to Jordans reputation and $550,000 for Jordans lost
earnings. To prove statements about a public figure are libelous, they must be malicious,
false and known to be false by the person making the statements. (8/18/98 8/23/98)
Actress sues Home
Shopping Network
ST. PETERSBURG Actress Mimi Rogers filed a $10 million libel suit
against The Home Shopping Network, claiming the television station fed false information
to the National Enquirer that damaged her reputation.
The Enquirer published a story, which quoted anonymous Home
Shopping Network sources and insiders, about an alleged temper tantrum Rogers had at the
television studio. In her suit, Rogers said the station gave the Enquirer
"false and defamatory" information that portrays her as an "unstable
individual who, without provocation engaged in violent, irrational and socially
unacceptable behavior."
Rogers is seeking $10 million in general damages, as well as punitive
damages and court costs. (8/3/98)
Student, Florida Blue
Key settle
GAINESVILLE A University of Florida student settled with a
leadership honorary for $85,000. A jury had originally awarded the student $250,000 in
damages. Charles Grapski, a doctoral candidate, sued Florida Blue Key and two of its
members over fliers posted during a 1995 student government campaign that falsely accused
Grapski of child molestation. (Brechner Report, August 1998)
The settlement includes a requirement that Grapski be allowed one hour
with the groups alumni advisory board. The settlement also releases Florida Blue Key
from any liability. However, the jury award still stands for another defendant in
the case, UF Student Body President John McGovern. He will be responsible for the $165,000
difference in the award if a judge declares the judgement final. One defendant in the
case, Peter Vlcek, was injured in a car accident during the trial and has yet to be tried.
Vlceks trial is set for Oct. 5. (9/15/98)
Judge
lifts ban on broadcasting jurors face
ORLANDO A circuit judge lifted a ban on showing jurors faces
during the selection process in a high-profile murder trial. The trial of Juan Carlos
Chavez, charged with the kidnapping and murder of a nine-year-old boy, was moved from
Miami to Orlando. The change of venue made it unnecessary to continue the ban on
televising jurors faces, according to Circuit Judge Marc Schumacher, 11th Judicial
Circuit. The restriction on publishing jurors names remains. (8/26/98)
Judge
denies request for gag order in murder trial
VERO BEACH A circuit judge denied a request for a gag order in a
murder trial on the basis that publicity in the case does not warrant it.
Circuit Judge Robert Hawley, 19th Judicial Circuit, ruled that the
publicity the case received to that point was not so extensive or overwhelming as to need
a gag order.
The attorney for Patrick McIntyre, charged with strangling a woman and
setting fire to her apartment to hide the body, argued that news stories about McIntyre
would make it difficult to seat an impartial jury. (8/4/98)
Appeals court: draft not public
BROOKSVILLE The Fifth District Court of Appeal overturned a trial
courts ruling that a draft of a city audit report fit the definition of a public
record.
The case arose after the Hernando County Clerk of Court, Karen Nicolai,
conducted preliminary work for an internal audit of the countys legal department.
Nicolai presented her preliminary findings to an audit services employee, the county
administrator and the county attorney. Those present had the option to respond to the
findings before the final audit was released. Nicolai refused to release the draft audit
until she received the responses and filed the final audit report.
The appellate court determined that because the final audit report had
not been presented to the city, it was not a public record. According to section 119.07(3)
of Florida Statutes, an audit is subject to disclosure when it becomes final. (8/28/98)
No
violations by Escambia school district
PENSACOLA A grand jury determined that the staff of the Escambia
County School District did not engage in any kind of criminal wrongdoing when it denied
access to some school board records.
A candidate for a position on the school board filed the complaint
against the district. In it, he alleged that the school board denied access to what should
have been public records and open meetings. He also said the school board improperly
negotiated for property. The grand jury report said that the records requester
misunderstood the application of Floridas Public Records Law. (8/26/98)
Foundation holds Sunshine
seminars
TALLAHASSEE The First Amendment Foundation is holding several seminars in
October focusing on Floridas Open Records and Open Meetings laws.
The seminars are available to the media, government personnel, or members of the
public. The cost for nonmembers of the foundation is $25, and the fee includes
participation in the seminar, a 1998 Government in the Sunshine Manual and a one-year
membership to the foundation. Seminars will be sponsored by the Tampa Tribune, the Naples
Daily News, The Palm Beach Post, the Osceola News-Gazette and the St.
Augustine Record in each publications circulation area.
Anyone who would like more information about the seminars may call the First Amendment
Foundation at (850) 224-4555, or log into the foundations website at http://www.floridafaf.org.
Retail chain says site using
their name
TAMPA -- The owner of Tower Records, a national chain of music, book and video stores
sued a Tampa company that administers adults-only Internet sex sites.
Tower Records parent company, MTS Inc., alleges that Futurescape Inc. infringed on its
trademark and tarnished the Tower Records trade name by using a similar Internet name.
The retail company said Futurescape was using the domain name
"towerecords.com" to catch Internet users looking for
"towerrecords.com," the Tower Records site. Tower Records claims that the
Internet company was intentionally counting on people to misspell the domain name to the
record companys web site. (8/27/98)
Computerized public records
may be hard to access
By Michele Bush
Electronically stored public records should be
as accessible as records stored on paper. That may be a simple idea, but that isnt
what records requesters are experiencing.
In some cases, records requesters in Florida have faced obstacles when they try to
access electronically stored records. In research I conducted, people who asked for a
record that existed in both paper and electronic formats had more trouble trying to get
the version stored on computer. In some cases, records custodians charged excess fees and
took more time to grant access to records stored on computers. In this age of computer
efficiency, this should not happen.
Maybe it has something to do with Floridas Public Records law. According to the
definition of public records, case law and Attorney General Opinions, electronically
stored records must be treated the same as paper records, but that isnt always put
into practice.
The public records law has clear provisions for copying paper recordseach page
should cost no more than 15 cents and certified copies are $1 per page. The law says
records custodians can levy an extra charge for "the extensive use of information
technology resources," according to Fla. Stat. 119.07(1)(a). But what does that mean?
For some custodians, that meant not charging anything for the public record. For other
custodians, it meant charging up to $200 for the same public record.
Records requesters faced delays when requesting computerized records because custodians
said it would take days to find the record in the system. Then it would take more time
configure the file and to print out the record. Computers should be used to facilitate
access to public records. Computerizing records should make them easier to search and
retrieve.
Dan Keating, research and technology editor for The Miami Herald, said during
the Brechner Centers Florida Sunshine Summit last year that government agencies can
frustrate public access to computerized information. He said that some agencies deny
access to information just because it is computerized. He said he has seen agencies charge
excessive fees for copies of records because they see government information as a
lucrative asset that might yield profits.
In his preface to the 1998 Government-in-the-Sunshine Manual, Attorney General
Bob Butterworth said he looks forward to Floridas continued recognition as a leader
in providing public access to an open government. I agree with that sentiment. However, in
order to do that, every records custodians must be educated in how to use the computer
systems in their agencies to promote access to the public records in their care. Until
that happens, we will not move forward.
Return to the Online Issue Index
Return to the Brechner Center Homepage
|